From: | Neil Bothwick |
Date: | 14 May 2000 at 14:03:25 |
Subject: | Re: PFS2 - 3 Upgrade (Long) |
Don Cox said,
> On 14-May-00, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> That's one advantage, the main one is the sheer speed. I installed
>> Pagestream4 onto a FFS Zip disk yesterday. It took well over a minute
>> to load :(
> FFS on Zip disks is incredibly slow. Nowadays I leave mine on PC format.
It's an extreme example, but timely because I was only doing it a few
hours before. Even on HD, FFS is a *lot* slower than PFS. Unless you run
unstable software, the speed is more often an advantage than the
crash-resistance.
The person that runs PFS so it doesn't hurt when their applications
crash probably drives a Volvo.
Neil
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLICK HERE AND START SAVING ON LONG DISTANCE BILLS TODAY!
http://click.egroups.com/1/4125/3/_/468125/_/958309597/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails